OnePeople

Blix Wants New Resolution

UNMOVIC head Hans Blix said for the first time that he needs a new resolution on Iraq from the UN Security Council. This is important, since many Security Council members have openly questioned the need for such a resolution. Blix also says that Iraqi waffling on inspection arrangements were inconsequential. "What we are now waiting for is not really so much for further clarifications, which would be nice to have, but rather a new resolution from the Security Council," says Blix. He also cast doubt on the 19 October resumption of inspections, saying that his team could be in Iraq within 10 days of a new resolution.

The Guardian characterized the UN activity as a "deadlock," while the BBC has Blix patiently "waiting for a decision."

Reuters framed Blix' announcement as a reaction to Iraqi waffling on the Vienna agreement. The piece also points out that although Blix says his team will be ready ten days after a resolution, the current US draft has provisions which could force a 30-day wait.

The IRNA , which can always be relied upon for a fresh viewpoint, indicates that the US may not even have the requisite 10 votes to introduce its resolution. The story also announces that Blix is not as cozy with the US as is being reported: he is balking at some US requests, including:

• Armed UN escorts for UNMOVIC inspectors


• All five Permanent Members of the Security Council become involved in inspections


• US officials would be allowed to interview Iraqi nationals outside the purview of UNMOVIC

Christian Science Monitor points out that the upcoming debate on the floor of the General Assembly underscores the frustration of member nations with the organization of the Security Council, whose power lies almost solely with the five Permanent Members. The piece also provides an excellent history of the Security Council, including its roots in the League of Nations.