If you’re under the impression that the military is a monolithic, unthinking, unquestioning bureaucracy, you’ll be surprised by Parameters, the journal of the US Army War College. Think of it like Foreign Affairs for senior Army officers. Many of the articles are very relevant right now, including The CNN Effect: Strategic Enabler or Operational Risk? and The Moral Limits of Strategic Attack, which discusses the moral and practical issues surrounding “noncombatant immunity” and the Pentagon’s “effects-based” bombing strategies. The Bush Doctrine and War with Iraq is a wonderfully candid analysis of the new National Security Strategy. This is a wonderful resource, and unbelieveably, it’s free.
¶
Posted 30 March 2003
§
War
‡
°
It turns out that this may be a war for oil after all, but not in the way that you think. The United States has made it pretty clear that it’s not interested in Iraqi oil, but the opponents of the war seem awfully interested: scroll down to Section 2(b) of this Cooperative Research report on Iraqi Oil and Gas Reserves. It mentions a Department of Energy report documenting Iraqi oil contracts with “Italy (Eni), Spain (Repsol YPF), Russia (Tatneft), France (TotalFinaElf), China, India, Turkey, and others.” We’ve hinted at this before, but now we’ll come out and say it: could it be that some opposition to this war isn’t high-minded internationalism, but a craven attempt to ensure these contracts pay out?
¶
Posted 30 March 2003
§
War
‡
°
The front page of the Washington Post has a piece on how the Bush Administration completely screwed up its negotiations with Turkey. The Administration was foolish, setting a number of fictional deadlines without consequences. It was clumsy, allowing Turkey to think that they were far more important than they actually were. Finally, it was arrogant, asserting that we didn’t need Turkey anyway. This screwed up the war, the UN vote, and did permanent damage to the US relationship with Turkey — who will be desperately needed as Iraq’s reconstruction begins.
“One week into the war, the administration’s inability to win
Turkey’s approval has emerged as an important turning point in
the U.S. confrontation with Iraq that senior U.S. officials now
acknowledge may ultimately prolong the length of the conflict. It
is a story of clumsy diplomacy and mutual misunderstanding, U.S.
and Turkish officials said. It also illustrates how the
administration undercut its own efforts to broaden international
support for war by allowing its war plan to dictate the pace of
its diplomacy, diplomats and other experts in U.S.-Turkish
relations said.”
Continue reading... (272 words, estimated 1:05 mins reading time)
¶
Posted 28 March 2003
§
War
‡
°
Social Security will be bankrupt by the time I retire, but at least we’ll have a National Day of Prayer, encouraging us assess our faults, fast, be humble, and pray to God for guidance. Feel free to read the full text of H.Res. 153. I propose a National Day of Passing Meaningful Legislation.
It hasn’t been posted yet, but one of CNN’s embeds just reported from inside the city of Nasiriya, which he said was occupied by the coalition. I’m posting a summary of the report here, because it seems like it’s typical of what’s going on in the contested cities right now. The embed said that the mission, which was supposed to take 6 hours and has lasted six days, has been slowly winding down over the last three days. He made it sound as though the coalition had taken control of the town, and that the guerilla problem was relatively under control. This is in stark contrast to the reports from the BBC.
He said militias on both sides are fighting in the streets. This is also interesting, because I haven’t heard any reports of a pro-coalition militia there.
These pro-Hussein militias have hidden their weapons inthe fields surrounding the cities, and the reporter described a big effort to remove the weapons caches.
This part is a scary. Knowing that the coalition will not attack civilians, the pro-Hussein militia members shoot at the coalition units, and then immediately drop their weapons and disappear into the crowds.
Continue reading... (262 words, estimated 1:03 mins reading time)
¶
Posted 28 March 2003
§
War
‡
°
Turns out those irritating grocery cards don’t even save you money overall. They just make you feel like you’re saving money and let stores boast of savings they don’t offer to everybody.
The Poynter Institute has a good summary on the latest on the cards, which includes a WSJ story comparing savings in stores with and without cards and a Businessweek story on the privacy issues.
http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=2
Those Annoying Grocery Cards
It does annoy me that I now have three — count them, three — grocery cards to carry around so I can pretend I am saving money. You probably use them too, those little “discount” cards they swipe at the grocery checkout to “save” you money. But do cards save money? You might have guessed the answer is no. Stores use them to track your purchases.
The Wall Street Journal reports, “How much cash are you really saving by shopping at a supermarket that has a card, instead of a noncard store? To find out, we went shopping at both types of stores and talked to a range of card experts. We found that, most likely, you are saving no money at all. In fact, if you are shopping at a store using a card, you may be spending more money than you would down the street at a grocery store that doesn’t have a discount card.
Continue reading... (709 words, estimated 2:50 mins reading time)
Looks like big companies are finally getting involved in the fight against spam and pop-ups. Today Microsoft said it wouldn’t let hotmail subscribers send more than 100 messages a day — at least not unless they paid for more storage. It’s half-hearted, but still a start. Even a small fee might be deterent enough since spam only works by being essentially free.
AOL and other providers are now getting into the act. Mainly their efforts are lame, like the totally ineffective pop-up blocker I have from Earthlink.
With spam now making up half of all email, it’s about time for corporate America to get involved.
REDMOND, Washington (AP) — To cut down on junk e-mail, Microsoft Corp. is capping the number of e-mails that users of its free Hotmail service can send each day.
By limiting to 100 the number of messages that could be sent in a 24-hour period, Microsoft’s MSN division hopes to stop people from using its service to send the unsolicited messages, known as spam.
“MSN is strongly committed to helping stop the widespread problem of spam and this change is one way we are preventing spammers from using Hotmail as a vehicle to send the unwanted e-mails,” said Lisa Gurry, MSN lead product manager.
Continue reading... (265 words, estimated 1:04 mins reading time)

OnePeople.org Official SARS LogoWe were beginning to feel like delusional paranoids after reporting that the SARS outbreak was coming under control and patients were being discharged. Buried amongst the war items today, Reuters is reporting that the U.S. State Department is encouraging citizens in Vietnam to leave, even offering to pay for the plane home for diplomat’s families. Five schools are now closed, and cases have been confirmed in Germany and Britain. Scientists have identified the virus, which is probably in the paramyxovirus family, of measles and mumps fame. In a darkly humorous twist, the Hong Kong Hospital Authority chief William Ho has been hospitalized with symptoms of pneumonia.
Fox News cited this article, but it’s missing from their website. No coverage on CNN. A collection Russian companies shipped night-vision equipment, radar jamming, and and antitank missles to Iraq. The State Department has been talking to the Russian government about this for over a year, but the effort was complicated by the nuclear weapons treaty negotiations and their bid to get Russian help in North Korea. The Russian government said the company doesn’t exist, then said they were watching the company closely, then that the goods were legal, then that they couldn’t stop the shipments if they wanted to.
¶
Posted 23 March 2003
§
War
‡
°
It’s clip art, it’s sarcastic, it’s a nuanced commentary on the war. Get Your War On!