Skip to content

Monthly Archives: January 2004

Kucinich: Right Place, Wrong Time

The reporters who were there swear that this happened:

After the National Public Radio debate in downtown Des Moines, a post-debate press room was set up for the Democratic candidates to talk to the media.

Cameras and reporters surrounded Dick Gephardt, but many of them left after he finished speaking.

Just then, Dennis Kucinich entered the room and began addressing three television cameras that were sitting on tripods. The only problem was, nobody was operating the cameras.

And that’s not all. As one newspaper reporter muttered under his breath, “It’s not like any of those cameras are on, congressman.”

Hey, you never know.

– Des Moines Register, 10 January, 2004

WMD Argument Comes to a Head

On the same day that the anti-war Carnegie Endowment for International Peace released a report stating, under no uncertain terms, that the Bush Adminsitration “systematically exaggerated” Iraq’s WMD capability, the U.S. Joint Captured Materiel Exploitation Group leave Iraq.

So after nine months, no WMD are found and the Bush Administration withdraws 400 of the 1400 staff on their weapons inspection staff. Hoping tenacity and reptition can overcome reality, the U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell provides the most tepid defense of the Administration’s policy to date: “I am confident of what I presented last year, the intelligence community is confident of the material they gave me,” Mr Powell told reporters.

All Your Credit Card Statement Are Belong To Us

The Saturday before Saddam Hussein was captured, President Bush signed into law the Intelligence Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2004. Tucked away in this legislation is language allowing the FBI to collect any citizen’s financial information without judicial review or meaningful Congressional oversight. Pour yourself a cup of coffee and read Section 374 of the law for details.

This means that an FBI agent can draft a “national security letter” (NSL) and, as if by magic, get “financial information,” which is newly defined to include your transactions with stock brokers, travel agents, jewelry stores, the U.S. Post Office, casinos, and real estate agents, and car dealerships.

The support for this provision was predicated on an urgent need for the FBI to get this information. This is difficult to understand, since the FBI already has the power to get this information under Section 215 of the Patriot Act. Strangely, the FBI claims that it has never used the this power. So what’s going on here? Why give them this power when they’re not using the power they already have?

Why You Care About Thune

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/155120_potmaybe.html